Home News Rachel Maddow Gets Career-Ending News, Suffers WORST Ratings Since Trump Took Office

Rachel Maddow Gets Career-Ending News, Suffers WORST Ratings Since Trump Took Office

by J.C McCallum
Rachel Maddow Gets Career-Ending News, Suffers WORST Ratings Since Trump Took Office

Tell enough falsehoods and people will soon catch on.

For some, it may take a while.

Ultimately, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow is learning that the hard way.

Trending:

From Fox News:

take our poll – story continues below

Completing this poll grants you access to Flag And Cross updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

One day after finishing May with its worst ratings since Donald Trump took office, [Rachel Maddow’s] eponymous program faced a Vanity Fair bombshell report that the New York Times didn’t want its reporters appearing on Maddow’s show, not because her ratings were down, but because she was too far left, even for them.

The New York Times had reportedly blocked its reporters from appearing on “Maddow” because the program is too partisan, with one insider from the Grey Lady’s newsroom agreeing, telling Fox News “it rubs off” on any journalist who is too closely aligned to the far left.

Continued:

“I do think Maddow, and others on MSNBC, have very strong opinions that affect their ability to tell stories in an accurate way sometimes,” the source said. “You don’t get tainted just by appearing [on the show], but it’s better to err on the side of trying to maintain objectivity and caution.”

The insider said colleagues at the paper are divided as to whether or not appearing on Maddow’s show would actually damage their reputations. Many of the Times’ top reporters are aware and “rightly sensitive” about the paper’s reputation of leaning left, the source said, and appearing on “Maddow” makes it hard to convince people otherwise.

You never hear about a conservative accidentally making a liberal’s point for them.

That’s because conservatives have facts on their side, while liberals are being stubborn just to be stubborn; to redefine something they don’t like.

Check out this MSNBC reporter unknowingly explaining why the Second Amendment is so vital while discussing the turbulence in Venezuela…

You’re spot on, Kerry Sanders. If the government has all the guns, they can do whatever they please.

It’s too bad Democrats won’t acknowledge this fact and the importance of the Second Amendment.

Waleed Shahid is a Democrat strategist. He appeared on MSNBC to espouse a twisted version of democracy the left would absolutely love.

The thing is, Shahid is wildly inaccurate.

And it’s kind of crazy.

Shahid: “Democracy should mean taking power and wealth from those who hoard it, and making sure it belongs to everyone.

WATCH:

Share this:

Leave a Comment