On Tuesday a tweet by President Trump caused the beltway class and media to explode, as a result, they bypassed the fake news they were set to deliver.
The media fell for President Trump’s trick hook, line, and sinker!
The media was getting ready to report on Tuesday about Rep. Adam Schiff’s “bombshell” witness that gave testimony. However after the President’s tweet when he said, “So some day, if a Democrat becomes President and the Republicans win the House, even by a tiny margin, they can impeach the President, without due process or fairness or any legal right. All Republicans must remember what they are witnessing here – a lynching. But we will WIN!”
So some day, if a Democrat becomes President and the Republicans win the House, even by a tiny margin, they can impeach the President, without due process or fairness or any legal rights. All Republicans must remember what they are witnessing here – a lynching. But we will WIN!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 22, 2019
The timing was perfect and since President Trump used the word “lynching” the media freaked out and bypassed their own “bombshell” to report about the tweet. I 100% believe the President tweeted that out and used the word “lynching” to distract the media.
The media was ready to report about US Ambassador Bill Taylor’s testimony and what testimony was “leaked” to them. Of course, since Adam Schiff is keeping all the impeachment proceedings behind closed doors we only get snippets of the testimony leaked to the press by Schiff. To date, no witness in this bogus impeachment inquiry has been cross-examined and no full transcript has been released of a witness’s testimony.
What’s even more hypocritical is that Democrats have a history of having no issue using the word lynching to describe Republicans.
On March 14, 2016, during an interview on MSNBC Hillary Clinton said:
Hillary Clinton said Donald Trump is “inciting mob violence” that recalls lynch mobs Monday evening at an MSNBC townhall, where she also took tough questions on foreign policy and trade.
Clinton told MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, who moderated the event in Springfield, Illinois, that she holds Trump responsible for the violence seen in recent days at his rallies, and believes his rhetoric is not only wrong and offensive, but also “dangerous.” “He’s been building this incitement,” she said.
“When you are inciting mob violence, which is what Trump is doing,” Clinton said, “there’s a lot of memories that people have. They’re in the DNA. People remember mob violence that lead to lynching, people remember mob violence that lead to people being shot, being grabbed, being mistreated. And it’s something that has a deep, almost psychological resonance to people who have ever been in any position of feeling somewhat fearful, somewhat worried.”
During the Clinton impeachment proceedings on December 16, 1998, Dan Rodricks wrote in the Baltimore Sun:
So Clinton stepped into a trap set by those who’ve been out to get him. And, knowing this – because he’s a Rhodes scholar, after all – he still didn’t tell the whole truth. He gave his enemies the hanging rope. (I think he should have told Jones’ lawyers, and later Starr, that the question of his relationships with women-not-his-wife was none of their business. Or he should have told the truth.)
So here we are, my fellow Americans.
Clinton lied under oath, and that warrants impeachment. Right?
Some say no. A lie stemming from a private matter doesn’t matter. A lie in such a situation is understandable; most any man or woman would have done the same. Impeachment for such a minor offense would hurt the country more than Clinton’s lies ever did. Besides, this whole thing looks like a political lynching, an attempt to overturn two elections.
A piece written by the Washington Post on October 31, 2016, said this about former disgraced FBI Director James Comey:
Trump’s entire campaign boiled down to one argument, summed up in his ever-elegant designation of his opponent as “Crooked Hillary.” That was all he had. At his political rallies, even at the Republican National Convention, he encouraged his devoted throng to shout “Lock her up!” While many Republicans no doubt believed she had to be guilty of something (with the same confidence that many Democrats believed George W. Bush lied the nation into war in Iraq), they also needed her to be found guilty. With a sure loser as their nominee, it was their only hope. Republicans had become a lynch mob, demanding frontier justice, and they howled in outrage when Comey refused to participate in the hanging, accusing him of unfairly rigging the election when all he had done was his job.
The New York Times had this to say about the impeachment of Bill Clinton:
A ”large volume of calls” to Senator John Glenn, a Democrat who said this week that it would be ”reckless and injudicious” for him to join ”the rush to judgment” in the Lewinsky matter, have run 2 to 1 in favor of resignation or impeachment. Mr. Chabot’s office said the tally there was 425 to 15 against Mr. Clinton since Kenneth W. Starr issued his report a week ago.